Topic: Life
Some questions to ask:
If everything started by 'accident', shouldn't we be trying to have accidents instead of trying to control things? I mean, this is some accident we find ourselves in the middle of. (But then of course the act of trying to have an accident makes any result intentional rather than accidental.)
And, it would seem, with all the things we do 'wrong' and mess up with, the state of everything should be many times worse than it is. What is holding it all together, driving things so that in general life forms/organisms find life worth living?
When it comes right down to it, there is no way to prove one over the other. The observer can never be bigger than the whole to know for sure that all the facts are in. It is a question of faith or belief. In that case, the question is, which would one rather believe - that we live in a supportive universe or an unsupportive universe? Isn't 'supportive' what we really mean when we ask if there is a God?
There are surely holes in my logic, but perhaps the reader will try to take this as a whole and excuse my unholy (or holy?) considerations .